Rep.Tom Cole: Congress should pass another major pandemic
In assessing whether Mr. Cole had a reasonable expectation of personal privacy, the Court concluded that his lack of exclusive control “diminished [his] privacy interest in his laptop, at least in comparison to the personal computer at issue in [R. v. Morelli, 2010 SCC 8, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 253], but . . . did not eliminate it entirely” (para. 58). What did you expect? Court's highly nuanced "expectation In R. v. Jarvis, the Supreme Court of Canada builds on its criminal law decisions that developed the analysis of reasonable privacy expectations (including R. v. Cole, R. v. Vu, R. v. Fearon, and R. v. Spencer) with a highly nuanced, heavily contextualized framework for looking at whether there’s a reasonable expectation of privacy in the Reasonable Expectations of Privacy in the Computer Age: A Jan 28, 2013
Privacy in Personal Computer: Court Confirms Ownership Isn
Jul 22, 2020 J.Cole x Isaiah Rashad Type Beat - "Possible" (Prod.By R Jul 26, 2020
R v. Cole and an employee’s reasonable expectation of privacy
Oct 29, 2012 R v. Cole and are enshrined in B.C.’s comprehensive Employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the workplace, even when using a computer supplied by an employer. These rights were affirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v. Cole and are enshrined in B.C.’s comprehensive privacy laws covering the public and private sector. R. v. Cole, 2012 SCC 53 | Charter Cases R. v. Cole, 2012 SCC 53 The accused was a high school teacher who was allowed to use a school-owned laptop computer for personal use. A technician tasked with maintaining the computer on behalf of the school discovered nude photographs of an underage female student on the hard drive. R v. Cole and an employee’s reasonable expectation of privacy The recent Supreme Court of Canada decision of R. v. Cole indicates that an employee’s personal information, even if stored on computers owned by an employer, may attract a reasonable expectation of privacy. Read more on rabble.ca